Embryonic gene editing holds the promise of dramatically enhancing people by making them healthier and more resistant to disease throughout their lives. And although at least one lab in China has already edited embryosvirtually all scientists now using CRISPR are working with adult cells for therapeutic purposes.
Weapons could now be directed at the water supply or even crops grown by the enemy. Today genetic testing is widely available, such as prenatal karyotyping of chromosomes to check for genetic abnormalities.
Strains of pathogens could be tailored to the enemies strain of livestock or crops, starving a nation into surrender. A more controversial technique is the genetic alteration of gametes which causes a permanent change for the organism as well as for subsequent generations.
A particular retrovirus has been discovered which, harmless to pigs, has the potential to cause severe ill effects in humans. The potential risks involved to humanity rank alongside developments such as nuclear power in that the extent to which the whole population of this planet could be affected, is immense.
Personally the idea of this is extremely unappealing but it is clear that the efficiency of meat production would rocket as the result of such an advance.
Since all sides are likely to have some form of biological weapon, however, none would go unaffected, thereby causing large scale suffering.
By changing other common diseases, an antidote could be found to vaccinate allied populations while only the enemy would suffer. The main problem consists of the possible introduction of new diseases to humans.
Thousands of researchers are already using CRISPR short for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats to edit the DNA in adult cells with an eye toward creating breakthrough medical treatments. Of course if the gene is corrected without further negative effects, the genetic disorder has been successfully eliminated; but if a problem arises it could pass on.
The benefit to the inflicting power is removal of enemy population without destroying buildings and resources as an atomic weapon would. A number of medical researchers, including the co-inventor of CRISPR, Jennifer Doudna, argue that scientists should hold off on editing embryos for now because not enough is yet known to safely predict the long-term effects of changes to our genetic blueprint.
On the other hand, the benefits to humans are obvious where gene replacement has been successful in improving aspects of food production. These problems may not even be immediately noticed and are hard to stop once cattle have been bred, crops sown or distributed.
Hence when a gene is removed, what is known about the function of that gene may not be all it codes for. An extreme idea of the future of meat production Man Made Life- Jeremy Cherfas involves the engineering of entirely new forms of meat: The inserted gene could even code for something harmful to humans.Free genetic enhancement papers, essays, and research papers.
Your search returned over essays for Genetic Enhancement and Politics - Genetic Enhancement and Politics Since the beginning of organized government there has always been a clash between science and politics. Whether it is as complicated as a. Genetic Enhancement and Politics Essays Words | 8 Pages Genetic Enhancement and Politics Since the beginning of organized government there has always been a clash between science and politics.
Many Americans are wary of using gene editing for human enhancement. By David Masci. on editing embryos for now because not enough is yet known to safely predict the long-term effects of changes to our genetic blueprint.
media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy.
Genetic Engineering Essay. Projects / Academic / Genetic Engineering Essay. If genetic alterations become widespread, genes required for particular circumstances or different environments that may be encountered by the organism, could conceivably be bred out. the decision was taken out of the scientists' hands by political powers-.
Genetic Enhancement is Unethical Essay - Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a. By John Cohan on September 1, in Essay. Genetic enhancement would make life easier for people.
Bruno Bettelheim, the child psychologist, in his study, “The Uses of Enchantment,” said that a struggle against severe difficulties in life is unavoidable, that it is an intrinsic part of human existence. We know that political rulers.Download