An annotation in the margin, however, will not only swiftly guide you to a pertinent section, but will also refresh the thoughts that you had while reading that section. You should include the facts that are necessary to remind you of the story.
On the other hand, if you find that having more elements makes your brief cumbersome and hard to use, cut back on the number of elements. By their very nature briefs cannot cover everything in a case. You might be wondering why annotating is important if you make an adequate, well-constructed brief.
No matter how long it takes, the dense material of all cases makes it difficult to remember all your thoughts, and trying to locate specific sections of the analysis may feel like you are trying to locate a needle in a haystack.
The same words may have different meanings in different laws. Remember that everything that is discussed may have been relevant to the judge, but it is not necessarily relevant to the rationale of the decision.
No problem — as long as you have a statement of the law available. You can direct your reading to the most important sections and will have an easier time identifying what is and is not important. It will allow you to mark off the different sections such as facts, procedural history, or conclusionsthus allowing you to clear your mind of thoughts and providing an invaluable resource when briefing and reviewing.
Pencil or pen — which is better to use when annotating? These brackets will allow you to color-code the case without highlighting all the text, leaving the most important phrases untouched for a more detailed highlight marking or underlining.
A brief should be brief!
Remember that the purpose of a brief is to remind you of the important details that make the case significant in terms of the law. It will be a reference tool when you are drilled by a professor and will be a study aid when you prepare for exams.
Excerpt reproduced from Introduction to the Study of Law: Highlighting takes advantage of colors to provide a uniquely effective method for reviewing and referencing a case.
One subject in which Procedure History is virtually always relevant is Civil Procedure. Elements that you may want to consider including in addition to the four basic elements are:The IRAC method is the standard of legal writing, structured to communicate logical reasoning in a precise fashion.
The key to such precise communication is to give the audience an efficient and effective argument by presenting all pertinent facts, applicable rules, and the logical framework of that argument.
Before attempting to “brief” a case, read the case at least once. Follow the “IRAC” method in briefing cases: Facts* Write a brief summary of the facts as the court found them to be.
Eliminate facts that are not relevant to the court’s analysis.1/5(1). How to brief a case (Part 2) IRAC brief = FIRAC brief.
Do an Internet search of “briefing a case” (or similar terms) and you will notice that some of the webpage titles that turn up refer to an IRAC briefing format (such as How to. How to Brief a Case Using the “IRAC” Method When briefing a case, your goal is to reduce the information from the case into a format that will provide you with a helpful reference in class and for review.
Briefing Cases--The IRAC Method When briefing a case, your goal is to reduce the information from the case into a one-page case brief. When we discuss the case in class, you will immediately be able to.
IRAC: How to Write about Legal Cases Leonard Tourney, Gina Genova Before presenting our case, we should introduce IRAC, a method of presenting arguments on legal cases that has been successfully used by generations of law students.
IRAC is an acronym that stands for: Issue.Download